Home

I'm looking for:

We're using cookies, but you can turn them off in your browser settings. Otherwise, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more in our Privacy Policy

CFA Institute Explores Investor Views on ESG Integration

13 December, 2021
Washington, D.C. United States
Investors Want More Clarity Around Standards for ESG Integration

CFA Institute today announced the results of a new, global member survey on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. The survey of CFA Institute members asked these professional analysts and investors about the duty of investment managers to integrate ESG factors into their investment analysis and decision-making, as well as their views on the need for formal, government-backed standards for how public companies report on ESG matters.

“Uncovering investor viewpoints is critical at a time when global regulatory policy is in a state of flux concerning the role ESG factors play in the practice of investment management,” said Margaret Franklin, CFA, President and CEO, CFA Institute. “Policymaker debates and regulatory changes are well underway on a variety of climate change and ESG topics around the world. Our members suggest these debates would be better settled between investors and their investment managers rather than regulators.”

Regarding the integration of ESG factors by investment managers, most respondents think: 

  • Customers and their investment managers should decide on ESG integration, not regulators.
  • Regulators should not mandate ESG integration.
  • Financial materiality should be the primary focus of investment managers who do integrate ESG issues into their investment performance.
  • Greenwashing should be addressed with clear and consistent rules on marketing and measuring adherence to ESG product claims.[1]

On public company reporting on ESG matters, most respondents think:

  • Formal, government-backed standards for public company reporting on ESG should be established.
  • Mandatory public company reporting on ESG should be delayed until after formal reporting standards are enacted.
  • A baseline of globally consistent standards for ESG reporting is preferred to many regional approaches.
  • Voluntary ESG reporting pursuant to private reporting frameworks is not favored.
  • Auditor assurance of ESG reporting should wait until government-backed standards for ESG reporting are in place and mandatory for public companies.

Matt Orsagh, CFA, CIPM, Director of Capital Markets Policy at CFA Institute, adds: “The findings from our survey shed light on the views of investors regarding key debates in the current maelstrom of ESG policy actions and will clearly help inform the global debate as regulatory initiatives evolve.”

[1] CFA Institute: Global ESG Disclosure Standards For Investment Products, 2021

Notes to Editors

In September 2021, CFA institute received a total of 710 responses out of 30,000 surveys sent, a response rate of 2.4% with a margin of error of ±3.6%. The survey had a very high completion rate of 93%. In terms of regional responses, 61% of the responses came from the Americas, 26% came from Europe/Middle East (EMEA), and 14% came from Asia Pacific. The full survey can be found on CFA Institute’s website here.